Authors |
Mochizuki S, Dahlöf B, Shimizu M, Ikewaki K, Yoshikawa M, Taniguchi I, Ohta M, Yamada T, Ogawa K, Kanae K, Kawai M, Seki S, Okazaki F, Taniguchi M, Yoshida S, Tajima N; Jikei Heart Study group. |
|
Title |
Valsartan in a Japanese population with hypertension and other cardiovascular disease (Jikei Heart Study): a randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint morbidity-mortality study |
|
Full source | Lancet 2007;369:1431-9 | |
|
||
|
||
Abstract |
BACKGROUND:
Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system benefit patients
at risk for or with existing cardiovascular disease. However, evidence
for this effect in Asian populations is scarce. We aimed to investigate
whether addition of an angiotensin receptor blocker, valsartan, to conventional
cardiovascular treatment was effective in Japanese patients with cardiovascular
disease. METHODS: We initiated a multicentre, prospective, randomised
controlled trial of 3081 Japanese patients, aged 20-79 years, (mean 65
[SD 10] years) who were undergoing conventional treatment for hypertension,
coronary heart disease, heart failure, or a combination of these disorders.
In addition to conventional treatment, patients were assigned either to
valsartan (40-160 mg per day) or to other treatment without angiotensin
receptor blockers. Our primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular
morbidity and mortality. Analysis was by intention to treat. The study
was registered at clintrials.gov with the identifier NCT00133328. FINDINGS:
After a median follow-up of 3.1 years (range 1-3.9) the primary endpoint
was recorded in fewer individuals given valsartan than in controls (92
vs 149; absolute risk 21.3 vs 34.5 per 1000 patient years; hazard ratio
0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.79, p=0.0002). This difference was mainly attributable
to fewer incidences of stroke and transient ischaemic attack (29 vs 48;
0.60, 0.38-0.95, p=0.028), angina pectoris (19 vs 53; 0.35, 0.20-0.58,
p<0.0001), and heart failure (19 vs 36; 0.53, 0.31-0.94, p=0.029) in
those given valsartan than in the control group. Mortality or tolerability
did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: The addition of valsartan
to conventional treatment prevented more cardiovascular events than supplementary
conventional treatment. These benefits cannot be entirely explained by
a difference in blood pressure control. |
|
Abstract in italiano |
EFFICACIA DI UN SARTANO IN UNA COORTE GIAPPONESE AFFETTA DA MALATTIE CARDIOVASCOLARI
|