Authors |
Cholesterol
Treatment Trialists (CTT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell
L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH,
Keech A, Simes J, Collins R.
|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND: Lowering of LDL cholesterol with standard statin regimens
reduces the risk of occlusive vascular events in a wide range
of individuals. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of
more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol with statin therapy.
METHODS: We undertook meta-analyses of individual participant
data from randomised trials involving at least 1000 participants
and at least 2 years' treatment duration of more versus less intensive
statin regimens (five trials; 39?612 individuals; median follow-up
5·1 years) and of statin versus control (21 trials; 129?526
individuals; median follow-up 4·8 years). For each type
of trial, we calculated not only the average risk reduction, but
also the average risk reduction per 1·0 mmol/L LDL cholesterol
reduction at 1 year after randomisation.
FINDINGS: In the trials of more versus less intensive statin therapy,
the weighted mean further reduction in LDL cholesterol at 1 year
was 0·51 mmol/L. Compared with less intensive regimens,
more intensive regimens produced a highly significant 15% (95%
CI 11-18; p<0·0001) further reduction in major vascular
events, consisting of separately significant reductions in coronary
death or non-fatal myocardial infarction of 13% (95% CI 7-19;
p<0·0001), in coronary revascularisation of 19% (95%
CI 15-24; p<0·0001), and in ischaemic stroke of 16%
(95% CI 5-26; p=0·005). Per 1·0 mmol/L reduction
in LDL cholesterol, these further reductions in risk were similar
to the proportional reductions in the trials of statin versus
control. When both types of trial were combined, similar proportional
reductions in major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L LDL
cholesterol reduction were found in all types of patient studied
(rate ratio [RR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·76-0·80;
p<0·0001), including those with LDL cholesterol lower
than 2 mmol/L on the less intensive or control regimen. Across
all 26 trials, all-cause mortality was reduced by 10% per 1·0
mmol/L LDL reduction (RR 0·90, 95% CI 0·87-0·93;
p<0·0001), largely reflecting significant reductions
in deaths due to coronary heart disease (RR 0·80, 99% CI
0·74-0·87; p<0·0001) and other cardiac
causes (RR 0·89, 99% CI 0·81-0·98; p=0·002),
with no significant effect on deaths due to stroke (RR 0·96,
95% CI 0·84-1·09; p=0·5) or other vascular
causes (RR 0·98, 99% CI 0·81-1·18; p=0·8).
No significant effects were observed on deaths due to cancer or
other non-vascular causes (RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·92-1·03;
p=0·3) or on cancer incidence (RR 1·00, 95% CI 0·96-1·04;
p=0·9), even at low LDL cholesterol concentrations.
INTERPRETATION: Further reductions in LDL cholesterol safely produce
definite further reductions in the incidence of heart attack,
of revascularisation, and of ischaemic stroke, with each 1·0
mmol/L reduction reducing the annual rate of these major vascular
events by just over a fifth. There was no evidence of any threshold
within the cholesterol range studied, suggesting that reduction
of LDL cholesterol by 2-3 mmol/L would reduce risk by about 40-50%.
FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation,
European Community Biomed Programme, Australian National Health
and Medical Research Council, and National Heart Foundation.
|