Authors |
F
van Nooten, GM Davies, JW Jukema, AH Liem, E Yap, XH Hu.
|
Abstract
|
Objective This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of
ezetimibe plus simvastatin (E/S) versus atorvastatin or simvastatin
monotherapy as second-line treatment of primary hypercholesterolaemia
from the Dutch healthcare perspective.
Methods The evaluation used a Markov model and patient data from
the Dutch EASEGO study in which patients failing to reach goal
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on atorvastatin 10
mg or simvastatin 20 mg had their dose doubled or switched to
ezetimibe 10 mg plus generic simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20). The
second scenario, based on Dutch guidelines, switched patients
fromsimvastatin 40 mg to atorvastatin 40 mg, or ezetimibe 10mgwas
added to simvastatin 40 mg (E10/S40). The key effectiveness input
measure was change in total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein
ratio obtained from the EASEGO study. In conformity with published
studies linking reduced lipid levels to reduced risk of cardiovascular
events, the presentmodel assumed that a lipid decrease with ezetimibemay
be a signal for reduced risk of cardiovascular events. Model parameters
were derived from published literature. Sensitivity analyses were
performed for the key parameters.
Results In the EASEGO scenario, incremental costeffectiveness
ratio for E10/S20 was €3497/quality-adjusted life-years (QALY)
vs atorvastatin 20 mg and €26,417/QALY vs simvastatin 40
mg. In the Dutch guidelines scenario, E10/S40 was dominant (more
effective and costsaving) vs atorvastatin 40 mg. Varying model
inputs had limited impact on the cost-effectiveness of E/S.
Conclusions The analysis showed the cost-effectiveness of E/S
versus atorvastatin 20 mg or simvastatin 40 mg (EASEGO scenario)
at a threshold of €30,000/QALY and vs atorvastatin 40 mg
was dominant (Dutch guidelines). Thus, E/S seems a valuable cost-effective
second-line treatment option for patients not attaining lipid
treatment goals.
|